Digital technology has become a key dimension of geopolitical, economic, and normative power with states like China and the United States racing to claim the mantle of technological leadership. Others like Canada, Israel, Japan, and the UK are following.
The EU has recognized that the instruments at its disposal are increasingly limited to its regulatory power, leveraging the desire of technology actors to access the vast European market. But relative marketsize decline and steady erosion of innovation vis-à-vis peer competitors – even on Europe’s own competitive turf (automobiles, appliances, and industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)) – are beginning to take a heavier toll on Europe’s strategic outlook toward 2030. This has significant – and often still underappreciated – geopolitical implications for Europe’s future.
As the EU has moved from a narrative around the Digital Single Market (DSM) to one around digital sovereignty, leaders have seen a growth in defensive action aimed at managing digital spaces – particularly in information and communication technology services (ICT) – and a new jolt of tech-industrial policy activity, most recently seen in the pandemic-inspired Recovery and Resilience Facility (RFF). The European Union has begun to coalesce around the notion of “digital sovereignty” as the leitmotif of its efforts, but has yet to tackle shades of difference between key players. The quest for digital sovereignty, which combines narrative power with rhetorical ambiguity, can at times paper over hard choices about strategic policy objectives, particularly between France and Germany, for the sake of consensus building.
Six realities frame the EU’s approach as it tries to forge unity for a more forceful, geopolitically-minded digital tech policy. First, Europe’s digital market remains fragmented. Second, technology itself has taken on a more general-purpose nature, with applications across sectors. Third, the geopolitical environment – particularly US-China tech competition – has raised the potential for the development of separate technology stacks. Fourth, the coronavirus pandemic has fueled the acceleration of Europe’s digital dependences on external actors and consolidated the dominance of Big Tech. Fifth, there has been a global renaissance in tech industrial policy. And finally, data governance is an increasingly contested space with the specter of digital localization looming large.
相关报告
清华何继江200页PPT:从欧洲能源转型思考中国碳中和路线图
1.4w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-03
标签:碳中和、能源转型、欧洲)
语言:中文
金额:19.99元
欧洲数字主权报告(英)
3529
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-12
标签:欧洲、数字主权)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
德国智库-欧洲各国对中国的依赖:认知与现实(英)
3313
类型:专题
上传时间:2022-04
标签:欧洲、中国、现实)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
绿动欧洲:中国新能源汽车企业在欧发展报告
1974
类型:行研
上传时间:2024-06
标签:新能源汽车、在欧发展、欧洲)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
德国智库-中国电动汽车制造商瞄准欧洲(英)
1707
类型:行研
上传时间:2021-09
标签:电动汽车、制造商、欧洲)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
ROUTLEDGE-中美在欧洲的科技主导地位之争(英)
1606
类型:专题
上传时间:2022-03
标签:中美、欧洲、科技主导地位)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
欧洲数据治理条例(数据治理法)
1427
类型:政策法规
上传时间:2020-11
标签:欧洲、数据治理)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
2021年跨大西洋经济:美国和欧洲之间的工作,贸易和投资年度调查(英)
1403
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-03
标签:大西洋经济、欧洲、美国)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
Dealroom3.2万字--窥见新质生产力:2023欧洲深度科技发展报告(中英文对照)
1172
类型:行研
上传时间:2024-03
标签:欧洲、科技、深度科技)
语言:中英
金额:19.9元
欧洲充电基础设施报告
1043
类型:行研
上传时间:2022-05
标签:充电基础、英文、欧洲)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册