The pandemic has revived the longstanding debate about the effect of online versus face-to-face instruction on student achievement. The goal of this paper is to provide new evidence on the impact of online versus face-to-face instruction on student learning outcomes, using rich, transcript-level longitudinal data from a public university. We pay particular attention to eliminating selection bias by incorporating student and instructor fixed effects into the empirical analysis as well as to separate out the impact of online versus in-person education from COVID-19-related confounding factors. Our results indicate that students in face-to-face courses perform better than their online counterparts with respect to their grades, the propensity to withdraw from the course, and the likelihood of receiving a passing grade. However, our investigation also reveals that instructor-specific factors, such as leniency in grading or actions towards preventing violations of academic integrity, play a significant role in determining the studied relationship. Without accounting for these instructor-specific factors, the relationship is severely biased, causing one to mistakenly conclude that online instruction is better for student learning than face-to-face instruction. Our analysis further documents a rise in grades associated with COVID-19-triggered changes to student assessment policies embraced by universities as well as instructors adopting a more flexible approach to grading. While these developments led to an increase in grades for all students overall, those who began Spring 2020 in face-to-face courses appear to have benefitted more generously from them. Finally, an auxiliary analysis shows that living in neighborhoods with better broadband technology is associated with a larger increase in grades among students who had to switch from in-person to online instruction during COVID-19. This finding supports the argument that unequal access to technology might have caused learning disparities to get deepened during the pandemic.
相关报告
在线教育行业内容营销洞察白皮书
5757
类型:行研
上传时间:2020-12
标签:在线教育、营销洞察、白皮书)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
K12在线教育行业分析报告(2021)
3571
类型:行研
上传时间:2021-01
标签:K12、在线教育)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
在线教育行业报告:复盘与展望,在线教育的中场战事-20210310-49页
2442
类型:行研
上传时间:2021-03
标签:在线教育)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
2020年中国在线教育网课市场白皮书暨2021年前瞻报告
2314
类型:行研
上传时间:2021-02
标签:在线教育、网课、白皮书)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
K12在线教育行业广告策略用户调研报告
1931
类型:行研
上传时间:2020-10
标签:K12、在线教育、广告)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
:2020年中国K12在线教育行业报告
1827
类型:行研
上传时间:2020-12
标签:K12、在线教育)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
【野生运营】2020上半年教育圈增长案例合集
1661
类型:学习教育
上传时间:2021-02
标签:在线教育)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
·中国在线教育行业趋势报告
1520
类型:行研
上传时间:2020-10
标签:在线教育)
语言:中文
金额:免费
_在线教育用户增长闭环白皮书_
1486
类型:行研
上传时间:2021-02
标签:在线教育、用户增长闭环、白皮书)
语言:中文
金额:免费
中国K12在线教育市场调研 及用户消费行为报告
1313
类型:行研
上传时间:2020-07
标签:在线教育、k12、消费)
语言:中文
金额:免费
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册