Disparities in health care and health outcomes are a pressing policy problem in the United States.
Recent attention has focused on the role of social risk factors in disparities in health care quality1 and the ramifications of not accounting for social risk factors in value-based payment and accountability initiatives.2 In this issue of JAMA Health Forum, Meyers and colleagues3 report findings from a study in which they constructed simulated star ratings for Medicare Advantage health plans (ie, contracts).
These simulated star ratingswere based on 22 Medicare Advantage quality measures estimated for subgroups of enrollees in each contract, specifically those who were Black, Hispanic, or White individuals, and those with low or high socioeconomic status (SES). The authors found lower simulated star ratings associated with low SES among Black and Hispanic enrollees compared with high SES and White enrollees. As in prior studies, they found variation in performance and disparities by the sociodemographic composition of contract enrollees. The authors also report estimated contract-level associations in performance across subgroups that likely understate true associations, being attenuated by the limited reliability of some measurements.4 The study by Meyers and colleagues3 adds to the growing body of studies describing qualityperformance disparities for individuals with greater burdens of social risk factors.2 The authors found evidence of disparities in 1 of the largest quality-incentive programs in the United States, consistent with prior findings reported by Joynt and colleagues5 in 9 federal performance-based payment systems. The evidence prompts consideration of potential actions to address disparities in the context of performance accountability and value-based payment programs.We propose a 4-part approach to aligning measurement, reporting, and incentive payments with equity goals in such programs. Each component addresses a different facet of this pressing problem, and their complementary effects may offset the limitations that each component might have in isolation.
相关报告
美国vs孟晚舟:延后起诉协议全文(英文版)
8.4w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-09
标签:美国、孟晚舟)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
举报PPT火了!堪称范本!
7.5w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-02
标签:、举报)
语言:中英
金额:免费
最新翻译7万字!能源基金会:中国十四五碳中和综合报告2020(中英对照)
2.0w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-02
标签:十四五、碳中和)
语言:中英
金额:10元
哈佛1.6万字最新报告:中美AI霸权之争:鹿死谁手?(中英对照)
2.0w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-08
标签:中美、AI、人工智能)
语言:中英
金额:10元
11万字!兰德智库最新报告:中国21世纪的创新倾向(中英对照)
1.6w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-12
标签:中美、科技竞争、国家创新)
语言:中英
金额:10元
清华何继江200页PPT:从欧洲能源转型思考中国碳中和路线图
1.4w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-03
标签:碳中和、能源转型、欧洲)
语言:中文
金额:19.99元
未来房地产趋势202010
1.3w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-10
标签:房地产、都市圈、人口)
语言:中文
金额:19.9元
2025政府工作报告
1.2w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2025-03
标签:2025、政府工作报告)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
技术趋势2024(中文版)
1.0w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2024-04
标签:技术趋势、2024、AI)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
澳洲智库9万字:2022全球恐怖主义指数报告(中英文版)
9712
类型:专题
上传时间:2022-04
标签:恐怖主义、和平)
语言:中文
金额:15元
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册