Operational Risk (Sound Practices), published in February 2003, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Committee) articulated a framework of principles for the industry and supervisors. Subsequently, in the 2006 International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework— Comprehensive Version (commonly referred to as "Basel II"), the Committee anticipated that industry sound practice would continue to evolve.1 Since then, banks and supervisors have expanded their knowledge and experience in implementing operational risk management frameworks (Framework). Loss data collection exercises, quantitative impact studies, and range of practice reviews covering governance, data and modelling issues have also contributed to industry and supervisory knowledge and the emergence of sound industry practice.

 在2003年2月出版的《操作风险管理和监督的良好做法》（Sound Practices for the Management and Supervision of Operating Risk）中，巴塞尔银行监管委员会（巴塞尔委员会）为行业和监管机构阐明了一个原则框架。随后，在2006年《资本计量和资本标准的国际趋同：修订框架——综合版》（通常称为“巴塞尔II”）中，委员会预计，行业良好做法将继续发展，银行和监管机构在实施操作风险管理框架（Framework）方面扩大了知识和经验。损失数据收集工作、定量影响研究以及涵盖治理、数据和建模问题的一系列实践审查，也为行业和监管知识以及健全行业实践的出现做出了贡献。