Prior to the pandemic, the federal government’s fiscal anchor was to maintain its debttoGDP ratio at 30%. But then, with federal borrowing to finance the massive increase in pandemic-related spending, the debt ratio shot up to 47.5% in 2021. Rather than adopt the fiscal restraints necessary to return the debt ratio to its previous target, the federal government has embraced a new fiscal anchor—gradually reducing the federal debt-to-GDP ratio over the medium term—with no explicit target ratio or timetable.
Although it has adopted a very accommodating goal, the federal government argues that a declining debt ratio will provide the “fiscal room” to deal with future fiscal challenges arising from recessions, new pandemics, and geopolitical risks. To demonstrate its commitment to its new fiscal anchor, the federal government has projected a steadily declining debt-to-GDP ratio over the next 45 years, assuming a constant annual economic growth rate of 1.6%. However, the assumption that the economy will grow at a constant rate ignores our historical experience—that the Canadian economy will experience one or more recessions in the coming decades.
It is important to evaluate how major economic downturns could affect the public debt.
Negative economic shocks increase public debt directly, because government revenues decline and some public expenditures may increase, leading to larger budget deficits (or reduced surpluses), and indirectly over time through higher real interest rates on government debt and slower economic growth rates as public-sector debt increases. The direct and indirect effects of a recession could set off a debt “doom loop”, with the debt ratio spiraling upward if the government does not quickly respond by reducing its postrecession budget deficits.
In order to provide a realistic assessment of the federal government’s multi-year fiscal plan, we use a Monte Carlo simulation model to investigate how the federal government’s debt ratio might evolve if the Canadian economy is subject to random growthrate shocks similar to those experienced over the last 40 years. The model generates 1,000 episodes of the evolution of the federal net-debt ratio over a 20-year time horizon when the economy is subject to annual growth-rate shocks. It indicates that there is a 30% chance that the federal debt-to-GDP ratio will be higher over a 10-year time horizon and a 53% chance that it will be higher over a 20-year time horizon. The likelihood of no recessions occurring over a 20-year time horizon is only 15%. This means that it is very unlikely that the federal projected debt ratios will be realized. In other words, taking the federal government’s projected primary surpluses at face value, but with random shocks to the growth rate that mimic past experience, the federal fiscal anchor will most likely be violated. The probabilities of one, two, and three or more recessions over a 20-year time horizon are 32%, 28%, and 25%, respectively. When two recessions occur, there is a 60% chance that the debt ratio will increase.
What are the policy implications of taking the likelihood of future recessions seriously?
Clearly, a government’s fiscal policy should not be so restrictive that it entirely eliminates the possibility of an increase in the debt ratio after a downturn in the economy.
Nonetheless, we argue that the federal government should adopt a more restrictive fiscal policy to reduce the likelihood that the federal debt ratio will increase in the future.
Our model indicates that, if the federal government increased its projected primary budget surplus to 2% of GDP, the probability of an increasing debt ratio would drop to around 20%. As demonstrated in our recent publication, An Evaluation of Three Alternative Fiscal Anchors for Canada, (Dahlby, Ferede, and Fuss, 2022) and consistent with the conclusion reached by Alesina, Favero, and Giavazzi in their pioneering book, Austerity: When It Works and When It Doesn’t (2020), the best way to lower budget deficits and public debt is through restraint of public-sector expenditures.
相关报告
美国vs孟晚舟:延后起诉协议全文(英文版)
8.4w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-09
标签:美国、孟晚舟)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
举报PPT火了!堪称范本!
7.5w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-02
标签:、举报)
语言:中英
金额:免费
最新翻译7万字!能源基金会:中国十四五碳中和综合报告2020(中英对照)
2.0w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-02
标签:十四五、碳中和)
语言:中英
金额:10元
哈佛1.6万字最新报告:中美AI霸权之争:鹿死谁手?(中英对照)
2.0w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-08
标签:中美、AI、人工智能)
语言:中英
金额:10元
11万字!兰德智库最新报告:中国21世纪的创新倾向(中英对照)
1.6w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-12
标签:中美、科技竞争、国家创新)
语言:中英
金额:10元
清华何继江200页PPT:从欧洲能源转型思考中国碳中和路线图
1.4w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2021-03
标签:碳中和、能源转型、欧洲)
语言:中文
金额:19.99元
未来房地产趋势202010
1.3w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2020-10
标签:房地产、都市圈、人口)
语言:中文
金额:19.9元
2025政府工作报告
1.2w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2025-03
标签:2025、政府工作报告)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
技术趋势2024(中文版)
1.1w+
类型:专题
上传时间:2024-04
标签:技术趋势、2024、AI)
语言:中文
金额:5积分
澳洲智库9万字:2022全球恐怖主义指数报告(中英文版)
9746
类型:专题
上传时间:2022-04
标签:恐怖主义、和平)
语言:中文
金额:15元
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册