Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam. Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics – particularly cohesion and fragmentation – in social movements. The study considers the influence of the regional context and the applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology.

Ina Peters分析了集体身份和集体行动框架如何促成了反对贝洛蒙特大坝的集体行动的持续和最终分裂。通过重建冲突的理由，Ina Peters解决了关于社会运动中的动力--特别是凝聚力和分裂--的理论研究空白。该研究考虑了区域背景的影响以及西方理论在非西方案例研究中的适用性。它基于通过半结构化访谈收集的原始数据，并通过基于基础理论方法的自上而下和自下而上的综合程序进行详细分析。