I give "Frommer's Toronto 2007" high marks for directing me to such attractions as the Royal Ontario Museum (a smaller but still impressive version of the British Museum) and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's small but charming museum. Its restaurant recommendations were generally on the money too, particularly those for Le Select and Le Papillon. The book does, however, seem somewhat skimpy for such a complex and vibrant city as Toronto, and it didn't give me as much information as I wanted on such decidedly important subjects as the Toronto Subway. (A complete subway map, not just one for downtown, would have been extremely useful.) I noted the complaints about the book's inaccuracy with interest, because I found at least one place where the book was inaccurate; it gave the address of Second City as 56 Blue Jays Way, instead of the correct address of 51 Mercer Street. I wonder what other mistakes it contained that I didn't have the chance to check out. In any case, the book contains adequate information, and Hilary Davidson's writng style is breezy and enjoyable. But maybe I should have used Fodor's instead, as other reviewers suggested.

我给《2007年多伦多》打了高分，因为它把我引向了安大略省皇家博物馆（大英博物馆的一个较小但仍令人印象深刻的版本）和加拿大广播公司的小而迷人的博物馆等景点。书中对餐厅的推荐也很到位，特别是对Le Select和Le Papillon的推荐。然而，对于多伦多这样一个复杂而又充满活力的城市来说，这本书确实显得有些单薄，而且它没有提供我想要的关于多伦多地铁等明显重要主题的信息。我感兴趣地注意到对该书不准确的抱怨，因为我发现至少有一个地方是不准确的；它把第二城的地址说成是蓝鸟路56号，而不是正确的地址默瑟街51号。我想知道它还包含哪些我没有机会检查出来的错误。无论如何，这本书包含了足够的信息，而且希拉里-戴维森的写作风格轻松愉快。但是，也许我应该像其他评论家建议的那样，用《Fodor's》代替。